4g61t.org

Specializing in the 3g CSM
It is currently Sun Oct 26, 2025 4:34 am

All times are UTC-05:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 4:56 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:41 pm
Posts: 27
What are the factory squish clearances on the 4g64 and 4g63? What is the compressed thickness of the factory (or other) HGs?

Thanks!

_________________
89 Mirage
-sold-

Volvo 940 Turbo
t3/t4 and other goodies....

96 Land Rover Disco


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 8:52 pm 
Offline
CSM Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 8:16 am
Posts: 705
Location: Lancaster, PA
why do you wanna know? the HKS 1.6mm HG supposedly raises compression from 7.8:1 to 8.3:1 according to this site:

http://www.2kracing.com/index.php/cPath/476_494

_________________
90 GGSX
89 YX-600
92 Laser AWD


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:44 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:41 pm
Posts: 27
Just curious to see if anyone would know off hand, I can take some measurments I guess. I like to build engines that take advantage of tight squish clearances, and the many benefits that come with it.

That being said, if any of you know feel free to pipe up!

_________________
89 Mirage
-sold-

Volvo 940 Turbo
t3/t4 and other goodies....

96 Land Rover Disco


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 4:43 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 7:23 pm
Posts: 44
Location: Australia
The question is - how are you going to measure it? Difference in height between top of block and top of head possibly, or maybe the gap between head and block interfaces? As soon as you untorque those head bolts/studs then any crush on the gasket will be relieved.

May i ask what are the benefits of "tight squish clearances"?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:27 am 
Offline
CSM Expert
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2001 7:00 pm
Posts: 840
Location: St.Louis, MO, USA (In the middle)
more efficiant<sp

I'd say the gasket starts off at around .050 and compresses to around .035 to .040

_________________
Adam
93'FD Touring non-seq
05'WRX


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm 
Offline
CSM Expert
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 1792
Location: Perth, Australia
There are plenty of resources that will tell you what "squish" and for that matter what "quench" does in a given motor. Google search that stuff.

From memory you want about 0.045" clearance to take good advantage. However IMO squish isn't going to be so important with the 4G6x DOHC heads since they run a "pent-roof" style combustion chamber (unlike say a 8v EFI 4G15 motor with its kidney shaped chambers where squish is extremely important). The head does however sport a pair of quench pads that if you get the clearances right will give you a bit of artificial-octane.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:18 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:41 pm
Posts: 27
Quote:
The question is - how are you going to measure it? Difference in height between top of block and top of head possibly, or maybe the gap between head and block interfaces? As soon as you untorque those head bolts/studs then any crush on the gasket will be relieved.

May i ask what are the benefits of "tight squish clearances"?
I agree with the post above, google and ye shall learn :wink: As far a compressed HG height, the manufacturer of the gasket should be able to tell you.

As far a quench goes, the dual cam mistu heads dont have much quench area, or quench pads as some might say (most 4+ valve per cyl heads really dont due to the space constrainsts that come with puting that many valves in there :wink:), which is why heads of this nature usually make better use of tumble (in most cases) instead of siwrl.... EGH... tangent, sorry. Yeah the 4g15 would make great use, lost of quench pad, much like the volvo heads I know and love.

_________________
89 Mirage
-sold-

Volvo 940 Turbo
t3/t4 and other goodies....

96 Land Rover Disco


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:39 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 7:23 pm
Posts: 44
Location: Australia
The question still remains - how are you going to measure it :wink: ? I seriously doubt that without some proper measuring equipment (you might want to google that) one would be able to see the difference between 35 and 45 thou. If i remember my 61T block and pistons correctly, the chances of someone getting a nice flat surface on each part (block/piston) to line up properly whilst the piston is actually dead flat... add a bit of oil and there goes a couple of thou..
Unless running a competitive engine i seriously doubt that one would be able to tell the difference. Your thoughts?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 3:41 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:41 pm
Posts: 27
Quote:
The question still remains - how are you going to measure it :wink: ? I seriously doubt that without some proper measuring equipment (you might want to google that) one would be able to see the difference between 35 and 45 thou. If i remember my 61T block and pistons correctly, the chances of someone getting a nice flat surface on each part (block/piston) to line up properly whilst the piston is actually dead flat... add a bit of oil and there goes a couple of thou..
This isn’t rocket science...

The real way to measure and do so accurately without fancy equipment that mfg's have, is to measure from crank cl to the midpoint of the cams' cl after the head has been toured down... it works like a charm and its not difficult to do. As an example, Elring says they're gaskets compress to 45-47 range, people who use elring (and have measured) have reported numbers in that range.
Quote:
Unless running a competitive engine i seriously doubt that one would be able to tell the difference. Your thoughts?
This couldn’t be further from the truth, tight squish, in a nutshell, improves efficiency in MANY ways, it helps make tuning easier, which makes squeezing more power from the engine easier (that’s tip of the iceberg too). Also, when building an engine why the heck would you not want to make it more efficient (pleasant side effect: more "competitive" if that’s what you're concerned about).

The whole point is, after many calls to Mitsubishi, I still don’t have an answer for either of the questions I stated at the beginning of this thread, so I thought asking here might be worthwhile.... and it has. (thanks for the info adamrx7 and unior!)

_________________
89 Mirage
-sold-

Volvo 940 Turbo
t3/t4 and other goodies....

96 Land Rover Disco


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC-05:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited