| 4g61t.org http://4g61t.org/forum/ |
|
| Q. on EVO3 vs 16G http://4g61t.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=8580 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Bill Spruill [ Thu Apr 22, 2004 8:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Q. on EVO3 vs 16G |
I haven't had time to research, so I am starting here. My turbo may be shot, two days before NOPI in Richmond, Va. |
|
| Author: | mysteryman [ Thu Apr 22, 2004 8:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
EVO3 turbo? You did not specify, but I ASSUME thats what your talking about. The controversey between what comes on a EVO3 and what does not. Majority of the time an EVO3 motor had a Big 16G, better known as a Super16G here in the States. a small 16G pushes 505cfms at 15 psi of boost. A Big 16G from EVO3 pushes 550cfms at 15 psi of boost. Personally go with what you got which is the small 16G it will do what you want it to do which is support 300HP. Just understand you need the supporting parts to get the 300HP out of the motor. Take it easy! |
|
| Author: | Crackerman [ Thu Apr 22, 2004 12:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
there is a difference between evo 3 16g and a regular b16g, the evo 3 has a much lighter weight turbine housing, and a 2.5" outlet into the o2 housing. it also has a lighter/strong turbine wheel, and a ever so slightly larger compressor wheel, and is also slightly larger inducer area. with 2.5inch exhaust and a dsm smic, with the afc leaned out lsightly in the lower rpm ranges, i was able to get it(evo 3) to hit full boost by 2,800-3,000 rpm in 5th on the high way. it is slightly more expensive, but worth it. |
|
| Author: | Bill Spruill [ Thu Apr 22, 2004 5:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
| Author: | mysteryman [ Sun Apr 25, 2004 10:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
If your not seeing boost until 6000rpms man you got some exhaust issues. Either your running a really small exhaust, like stock or your cats clogged. Go read the turbo reviews under Parts reviews. You will see where alot of guys are hitting below 4000rpms full boost. |
|
| Author: | mysteryman [ Sun Apr 25, 2004 10:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
oppps also over looked the fact you might be running 1.8L/2.0L cylinder head, 2.0 intake, etc... my bag, even then I cannot imagine the boost coming in that late. |
|
| Author: | Bill Spruill [ Mon Apr 26, 2004 7:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
In answer to some advice, my exhaust is 3" through from header and new. I have been advised to remove the spring on the Ebrake; move to stage(still a problem); yank the Ebrake; rev that thing and slightly slip the clutch, then launch by releasing the Ebrake. Cool, got to test. Thanks to all. Oh, ran into Summitman; he was going to post some pics. Dnk where. |
|
| Author: | dsmracer [ Mon Apr 26, 2004 8:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Bill, are you still using the 4G61? With your 16G I'm assuming you're using the 7cm housing? |
|
| Author: | Bill Spruill [ Mon Apr 26, 2004 10:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
No, I made the switch. I have the small 16G, ported but not clipped. I believe it is the 6cm housing. The o2 housing is also ported with a larger waste gate flapper. Third gear is a blast. |
|
| Author: | mysteryman [ Mon Apr 26, 2004 11:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Clipped exhaust wheel, yeah thats one part of the equation thats most likely why its coming on so late. So if you have a 2.0L I still cannot see why your 16G is hitting that late, 5000rpms. Technique will not make the turbo spool faster. |
|
| Author: | mysteryman [ Mon Apr 26, 2004 12:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Why not just list everything that is installed on the car to date. Thanks will make it much easier to help. |
|
| Author: | red89 [ Mon Apr 26, 2004 12:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
What mph were the two runs? |
|
| Author: | Bill Spruill [ Mon Apr 26, 2004 3:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
made 102 on all three runs. Mods: 4G63T motor, no internals; Pacesetter equal length turbo header(insulate coating by Swaintech); ported o2 housing(ins. coat); 3" downpipe; 3" exh. tubing; Hi flow cat.; Thermal Research muffler; 4" tip; Walbro 255 fuel pump; Buscher FPR; OEM fuel rail; 550 injectors;1gen T/B(60mm);OEM manifold w/ 60mm opening; 2gen T/B elbow; 60mm tubing to FMIC(24"x8.75"x3.5")(custom,i.e.,home made, to bring charge in through lower half, turn back, exit top half) 2.5" openings; hi-flow air filter, 60 mm tubing; no MAF; small G16 turbo(ported, not clipped)w/integral waste gate; Turbonetics atmos. blow off valve; SDS stand alone engine mgmt., With SDS coil packs, 8.5mm spark wires. Spec five stage 3, 6 puck, sprung clutch. Suspension: Ground Control coilovers with adj. Koni shocks; Goodrich GForce T/A 205x50x15 tires. That about does it. |
|
| Author: | mysteryman [ Mon Apr 26, 2004 3:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Cool not clipped. Well I have no idea then why your taking that long to spool up. If your using AEM stand alone then sounds like its time to go back to the dyno and re-tune the car. Most likely your timing is off to the point its causing the motor to respond slow. With all that you have on the car you should be in the 12s easily. |
|
| Author: | Bill Spruill [ Mon Apr 26, 2004 4:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
As I said in the PM, I agree. Still, my driving is poor, launches are terrible. That can be worked. I am not sure if my exhaust is retarded 5o. Would that help? You think, maybe? |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC-05:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|