4g61t.org

Specializing in the 3g CSM
It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 8:22 am

All times are UTC-05:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:34 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 9:42 pm
Posts: 181
Location: Utah
I am trying to make my awd swap as easy as possible. Me and a friend were talking and we brought up the driveshaft. If i was able to eliminate the carrier bearings by running a 1 piece drive shaft then thats less work for me and the sooner my car will be spinning 4 lol. I was thinking of taking a dsm shaft cutting the yoke and rear u joint off and having a local buisness build me one. Is there any reason why I couldnt do this? Thanks.

_________________
89 Original Turbo Colt Gt AWD PTE 6262 Built 9:1, TRE stage 2. 10.93@129
05 Evolution VIII FP Green, garage queen.
97 Eclipse Gsx 80k miles, 6 Bolt, HX-35
08 Ford F-350 6.4 PSD 3 mods and 600hp :)


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:48 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:19 am
Posts: 1629
Location: Tonawanda, NY
I am in no way a professional driveshaft builder, but as I understand it you would need to increase the diameter of the driveshaft signifigantly to maintian the same tourque capability of the three piece.
The longer you make it, the fatter it has to be.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:13 pm 
Offline
Spends Too Much Time Under The Hood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:42 pm
Posts: 399
Location: Tampa Florida
thats what she said.


sorry i have nothing to contribute to the conversation.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:50 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 1:21 pm
Posts: 2143
Location: Tucson Az
because of the movement of the rear end.. and the engine/trans.. u have to have at least a 2 piece shaft with 1 carrier bearing.. most people use the front shaft and carrier.. then have the back half 1 piece.


Steve

_________________
Steve 89 colt 2.3 stroker stock top end. evo3@20 psi 13.489@99.30mph 3/10 2012
On drag radials.auto trans.launching @ 5 psi and no traction thru 2nd.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:22 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:19 am
Posts: 1629
Location: Tonawanda, NY
Here's a quote from the FAQ's on the Denny's driveshaft site:

"Exhaust System Clearance
I recently had a 3 inch exhaust system installed on my car and now I do not have much clearance for the driveshaft. What is the smallest diameter driveshaft that I can use that will handle the horsepower and weight of my vehicle?

This is a common and growing problem that we hear about more often than we ever did before. You should always have the driveshaft built before the exhaust system to avoid all of these problems. The high horsepower cars and trucks that need a 3 inch exhaust system also need a strong driveshaft. Unfortunately the tunnel does not always allow for the proper size driveshaft and the 3 inch pipes to all fit into the same space. Some high horsepower cars can use a 3 inch diameter driveshaft with no problems but others may require a 3.5 inch or a 4 inch and now it won't fit with the large diameter pipes. Length is a big factor in the proper selection of driveshaft tube diameter. The long wheelbase cars cannot use a 3 inch driveshaft due to length, rpm and critical speed issues but a short wheelbase car can use a 3 inch or a 3.5 inch if the space allows. Driveshaft critical speed is not a problem with shorter overall lengths. The advice here is to be sure that your exhaust system installer makes room for the 3.5 inch diameter as a minimal choice for a driveshaft tube diameter. Some of you with long wheelbase vehicles may in fact need a 4 inch driveshaft... so be sure to let the installer know what you may need before he begins the work. Better yet...get the new driveshaft first!"


I highlighted the part that confirms the basic theory of my previous post.


I just had the front piece of my DSM driveshaft shortened a few inches. It was cheap, and it maintains the strength and RPM capabilities of a DSM shaft.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:04 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god

Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 8:01 pm
Posts: 1108
Location: Sask. Canada
I also tried a one piece driveshaft and dont do it unless it is huge. I think mine was 2.5'' and was vibrating when I was gearing the car down into second, it was welded straight. Also never did try any hard launches or acceleration with it. I tried the one piece for ground clearance when I lowered the car, ended up raising the tunnel and using both carrier bearings.

_________________
- Works in da bush


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:08 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 9:42 pm
Posts: 181
Location: Utah
Thanks a bunch fellas you answered my question. Don't be surprised if you see more questions from me.

_________________
89 Original Turbo Colt Gt AWD PTE 6262 Built 9:1, TRE stage 2. 10.93@129
05 Evolution VIII FP Green, garage queen.
97 Eclipse Gsx 80k miles, 6 Bolt, HX-35
08 Ford F-350 6.4 PSD 3 mods and 600hp :)


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:08 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 52
Location: Bel Air, MD
If you are swapping in a 1G DSM rear, there should be no movement since the carrier is mounted to the chassis direct. If you run a 1 piece, you need to make sure you set your driveshaft angle.... The transfer case tailshaft and pinion should be parallel, but not on the same plane. If they line up exactly it'll wear a groove into the U joint since the bearings are not rotating. Improper alignment could account for Colt200s vibration.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:24 am 
Offline
Some call me a god

Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 8:01 pm
Posts: 1108
Location: Sask. Canada
Yes, the angles really do affect the drive line vibrations too. I think when I had my one piece installed they were withing 2* of eachother and the transfercase was a bit higher than the diff. I still say the best bet is to do a 2 piece because it is one step easier than a 3 piece, but 3 is better in my mind. Once everything is completed, you can shim the bearings with washers to get the angles better.

There is lots of info out there about driveshaft size/u-joint angles out there...

_________________
- Works in da bush


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC-05:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited