4g61t.org

Specializing in the 3g CSM
It is currently Tue Oct 21, 2025 2:54 pm

» »

All times are UTC-05:00



Post new topic  Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 10 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
snowdevl
 Post subject: Who remembers this car?
PostPosted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 1:56 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 4:20 am
Posts: 1254
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Just found a few vids on youtube of a car that was posted up on here a long time ago. CSM with a VR-4 front and 3000GT twin turbo motor.

I STILL don't like it, but with all the 4G63T CSM's out there now, it sure is unique.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzcGNwEjYSc&NR=1

_________________
1990 C83A 4WD 4G63T powered hatch - [PSIBRG]
1992 JZX91 2JZ powered Toyota Mark II
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Mechacode
PostPosted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:08 pm 
Offline
The happy administrator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:20 pm
Posts: 5583
Location: Wisconsin
Maybe if it wasn't jacked up like a 70's musclecar I'd like it.

_________________
Had a:
1991 Eagle Summit ES Hatchback - 4g15 12v 5spd
1991 Dodge Colt -4g15 12v 4spd
Have a:
1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass - 468BBO TH350
Round 3:
1990 Dodge Colt-4G63T 5spd
Top
   
Reply with quote  
fastvtgsx
PostPosted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:18 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god

Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 5:50 pm
Posts: 1220
Location: Htown, TX
Why are the rear wheels so much farther out then the from?? Seems like a lot of work and sort of silly but I guess if your going for unique they got it.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
CaptainTonus
PostPosted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 11:15 pm 
Offline
2nd Banana
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:16 pm
Posts: 9369
Location: San Diego, CA.
I definitely remember hearing about this car. Neat idea.

_________________
91 GSX - 511fwhp and 352 lb/ft 25psi 110 octane, 7.68 @ 95.9mph 1/8th 21psi 91 octane, 11.93 @ 112.9mph, 117.7mph best trap speed, 20psi 91 octane
98 Volvo S70 T5 - DD

http://www.facebook.com/captaintonus
Top
   
Reply with quote  
snowdevl
PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:17 am 
Offline
Some call me a god
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 4:20 am
Posts: 1254
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Quote:
Why are the rear wheels so much farther out then the from??
I think they used a full VR-4 rear setup (it's 4WD), which I guess is a bit wider than the factory CSM stuff

_________________
1990 C83A 4WD 4G63T powered hatch - [PSIBRG]
1992 JZX91 2JZ powered Toyota Mark II
Top
   
Reply with quote  
jeffball610
PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:16 pm 
Offline
CSM Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:31 am
Posts: 430
Location: Las Vegas
I still don't believe that the V6 motor could fit in this chassis. There simply isn't enough room. The 4G63 barely fits. I need some under-hood shots.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
snowdevl
PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:20 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 4:20 am
Posts: 1254
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
There were under hood shots the last time it was posted I think...
Remember it is Galant from the windscreen forward, so there's alot more room in the engine bay than there used to be.

_________________
1990 C83A 4WD 4G63T powered hatch - [PSIBRG]
1992 JZX91 2JZ powered Toyota Mark II
Top
   
Reply with quote  
vaj_colt
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:24 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:31 pm
Posts: 103
Location: anchorage, alaska
Some please tell me what kinda of rims are those, 3 spoke looks sweet, i gotta get one! :D

_________________
Build it, Race it, Break it, REPEAT!!!!
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Coltsfan
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:48 am 
Offline
Some call me a god
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:19 am
Posts: 1629
Location: Tonawanda, NY
Quote:
Quote:
Why are the rear wheels so much farther out then the from??
I think they used a full VR-4 rear setup (it's 4WD), which I guess is a bit wider than the factory CSM stuff

It doesn't look wider in the front, and my wheels don't stick out like that. I'm pretty sure my rear suspension is the same as a Gvr-4.

I think they were just using spacers to be unique... or make the chassis more unstable.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
biggspeed
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:10 am 
Offline
CSM Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 10:59 pm
Posts: 654
Location: AB Canada
I think it looks retarded. Cool concept, poor execution. Is that a Home Depot Household forced air return grill screwed to the hood? Thats just as bad as the v6 civic on here, Just plain dumb IMO. :-?
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 10 posts ] 

» »

All times are UTC-05:00

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited