4g61t.org

Specializing in the 3g CSM
It is currently Tue Mar 19, 2024 4:14 am

All times are UTC-05:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:59 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:33 pm
Posts: 176
Location: Nashville/Atlanta
While we are talking about E85, what do you plan to swap your walbro out for?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:32 am 
Offline
Some call me a god
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 4:08 am
Posts: 1263
Location: Hayward, CA
full blown makes a nice dual pumper and also buschur sells em

_________________
My feedback thread:

http://www.4g61t.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=18146


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 4:09 pm 
Offline
1595 cc's of fury

Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 3:15 pm
Posts: 1616
Location: Rastle Cock, CO
I doubt I'm out of fuel yet, Hemi-colt got to 570 whp on the same fuel set-up I have with a 63t/fp3065 built car vs my 61t/50trim. The 1000 cc injectors are right at 100% but he was running them way over 100% to get those numbers. I'm was probably in the 425 whp range corrected, you have to use corrected numbers for fuel because even at elevation we still need just as much fuel as low elevation guys...wierd huh.

I'm putting my 1150's back in though and will probably have to add a few more supporting mods.

_________________
Turning a 4g61t into 1595 cc's of FURY!
10.995 @ 134.44 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZXvcvzuWGQ

SOLD to the fastest shifting hermaphrodite in CO


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 4:19 pm 
Offline
2nd Banana
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:16 pm
Posts: 9369
Location: San Diego, CA.
Isn't an injector static over 80% duty-cycle anyway? I always thought you wanted to keep the IDC's below 80%, but that's pretty tough to do without going massively huge, and then your idle and driveability are compromised.

_________________
91 GSX - 511fwhp and 352 lb/ft 25psi 110 octane, 7.68 @ 95.9mph 1/8th 21psi 91 octane, 11.93 @ 112.9mph, 117.7mph best trap speed, 20psi 91 octane
98 Volvo S70 T5 - DD

http://www.facebook.com/captaintonus


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 6:41 pm 
Offline
CSM Junkie

Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 12:21 pm
Posts: 929
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Man, 1150's on the 1.6L? That is alot of fuel for the 1.6L. Is it because you are running E85? I know the 1.6L doesn't need as much fuel to run a higher psi of boost compared to the 2.0L. I mean, I have 450cc injectors with my BB 60-1 running right now 20 psi. My A/F is 11.0... is it because I am on 93 octane and a fully stock motor? Or is this A/F about right for what I have? Also, I thought the Walbrp 255 was good up to around 600whp?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 6:47 pm 
Offline
Some call me a god

Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 2:31 am
Posts: 1789
Location: Commerce City, Co
I have 1150's and E85 in my colt as well. And although I have not looked at my duty cycles in a while, I kinda think I have too much fuel. I have my sliders no less than -35% all the way across in dsmlink. My car studders and breaks up anything below 12.1:1 on the gasoline scale.

But my 1.6 is running those injectors and that fuel just fine for the most part.

Steven

_________________
1985 Mitsubishi Cordia
Build in progress


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:05 pm 
Offline
2nd Banana
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:16 pm
Posts: 9369
Location: San Diego, CA.
Quote:
I know the 1.6L doesn't need as much fuel to run a higher psi of boost compared to the 2.0L.
Less displacement = greater need for fuel. You'll never see a V8 guy using 1,000cc injectors unless he's trying to make ridiculous power.

_________________
91 GSX - 511fwhp and 352 lb/ft 25psi 110 octane, 7.68 @ 95.9mph 1/8th 21psi 91 octane, 11.93 @ 112.9mph, 117.7mph best trap speed, 20psi 91 octane
98 Volvo S70 T5 - DD

http://www.facebook.com/captaintonus


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:33 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:33 pm
Posts: 176
Location: Nashville/Atlanta
Quote:
Quote:
I know the 1.6L doesn't need as much fuel to run a higher psi of boost compared to the 2.0L.
Less displacement = greater need for fuel. You'll never see a V8 guy using 1,000cc injectors unless he's trying to make ridiculous power.
A V8 normally has twice as many injectors.

The less displacement needing fuel idea makes no sense, though.

Also you can't judge how much fuel you need by looking at boost numbers. A T25 will not be putting out anywhere near as much air/power at 18psi as a GT35 will be.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:50 pm 
Offline
2nd Banana
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:16 pm
Posts: 9369
Location: San Diego, CA.
Quote:
Quote:
Less displacement = greater need for fuel. You'll never see a V8 guy using 1,000cc injectors unless he's trying to make ridiculous power.
A V8 normally has twice as many injectors.

The less displacement needing fuel idea makes no sense, though..
Well less displacement means you're gonna have to rev higher in most cases, which uses a LOT more fuel. V8 guys always have a :o look on their face when I tell them I'm running 96#/hr injectors in my car, because guys in their world who are trying to break the sound barrier are running mayyybe 75#/hr injectors.

_________________
91 GSX - 511fwhp and 352 lb/ft 25psi 110 octane, 7.68 @ 95.9mph 1/8th 21psi 91 octane, 11.93 @ 112.9mph, 117.7mph best trap speed, 20psi 91 octane
98 Volvo S70 T5 - DD

http://www.facebook.com/captaintonus


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:02 am 
Offline
Spends Too Much Time Under The Hood

Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:41 am
Posts: 221
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Quote:
Quote:
I know the 1.6L doesn't need as much fuel to run a higher psi of boost compared to the 2.0L.
Less displacement = greater need for fuel. You'll never see a V8 guy using 1,000cc injectors unless he's trying to make ridiculous power.
Airflow is air flow and that requires fuel. They have more injectors which means that they can divide the size in half and get the same amount of output. Reving shouldn't have much to do with it because their larger displacement means that they move the same amount of air with less effort (RPMs.)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:36 am 
Offline
2nd Banana
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:16 pm
Posts: 9369
Location: San Diego, CA.
Quote:
Reving shouldn't have much to do with it because their larger displacement means that they move the same amount of air with less effort (RPMs.)
Yeah, that's kind of what I meant. If an engine isn't working as hard, wouldn't it require less fuel to do the job that's needed of it?

_________________
91 GSX - 511fwhp and 352 lb/ft 25psi 110 octane, 7.68 @ 95.9mph 1/8th 21psi 91 octane, 11.93 @ 112.9mph, 117.7mph best trap speed, 20psi 91 octane
98 Volvo S70 T5 - DD

http://www.facebook.com/captaintonus


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 6:07 pm 
Offline
1595 cc's of fury

Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 3:15 pm
Posts: 1616
Location: Rastle Cock, CO
I've always purely based injector need based on air volume projected devided by the number of cylinders. A v8 moving 1000 cfm of air will have injectors nearly half the size of a 4 cylinder also moving 1000 cfm of air. Its a pretty simple equation. As mentioned though, getting massive injector's tuned out on smaller displacements is pretty hard. 1150's are 20% bigger injectors offboost to a 1.6L than they are to a 2.0L - once the turbo spools however, your figures are then based primarly on the amount the turbo flows at a pressure level. Identical turbo's on a 1.6L and 2.0L running the same boost, are moving the same amount of air, just at different rpm points.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

All times are UTC-05:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited