I thought I would quote this email I received its from the guy who runs the following website he gave me some feedback on our brake options.
http://www.vysor.com/lancerproject.htm
[quote:26vuc8cd]I know the hub problem. You need to replace the current knuckle with a newer type that has the easy change rotor system. The main issue is the placement of the steering arm so you don't get bump steer problems. Camber is easy to address, see below. Outer CV splines are the same. Your car has 4x4.50" hubs. From what I recall of the 92 knuckle design, you could probably
a) use 93-96 Colt / Mirage (4x100mm pattern) knuckes, refitted with 4x4.50" Galant / Vista 4WD hubs. This provides the base for bigger rotors (250-275mmx24mm ventilated) and the caliper bracket mounts are the same. Has 74x40mm bearings.
b) use 88-92 Vista 4WD wagon knuckles, complete. The 2WD wagon had the same knuckle style as your car, but the 4WD was different, with 266mm disks. Has 80x40mm bearings.
c) use 93-96 Expo wagon (2WD or AWD are the same) knuckles. Also has the bigger 80x40mm bearings and 250x24mm disks. This is probably the best solution, as the tierod end is on top of the steering arm, like on your car (as I recall). This is what I wll soon have in my project car, but with the 5x4.50" Talon hubs fitted.
You'll want to locate the rear disk hubs and calipers from the 90-92 Colt
200 for any competetion vehicle (same calipers as the Talon, but the disks
are slightly thinner.
In all cases, you will have to compare the position of the steering arm in
making the selection. Then there's the question of camber.
a) slot the lower strut (not knuckle) holes. You can do up to about 3mm to
increase the -ive camber (if the new knuckle makes it +ive) and
b) slot the 2 (or 3) strut upper mount holes (in the strut tower) for more
camber adjustment, also about 3mm. You also have to make sure that the bolts
don't move in the slot (fiddle, fiddle, weld...)
regards,
Stewart DIBBS
[/quote:26vuc8cd]
Hope this helps...